Lee Strasberg ve Davıd Mamet’in oyunculuk yaklaşımlarında “sihirli eğer” çalışması

Abstract

Bu calismada Konstantin Stanislavski’nin oyunculuk yaklasimi olan Sistem’i elestirerek temelinde yine de onun bakis acisini barindirip ondan iki farkli uca ilerlemis olan Lee Strasberg ve David Mamet’in oyunculuk yaklasimlarinda onemli bir yere sahip olan “sihirli eger” calismasi ele alinmistir. Ýki yaklasimin da Sistem’den aldigi calismanin uygulanmasinda yaptigi degisiklikler ve bunlarla yontemlerin hedefledikleri incelenmistir. calismanin Strasberg ve Mamet versiyonlarinin oyuncu tarafindan kullanimi oyuncuda ve seyircide olusabilecek benzerlikler ve farkliliklar uygulama yapilarak deneyimlenmis sonuclari aktarilmistir. Arastirma hakkinda pek cok kaynak bulunan Metot ile cok az kaynak bulunan Mamet’in yaklasimlarindaki “sihirli eger” calismasi uzerinde daha once bilimsel bir calisma yapilmadigi icin akademik alana pratik bir katki saglamayi hedeflemistir.

In this work the exercise of "magic if" which has an important place in the acting approaches of Lee Strasberg and David Mamet, , is studied. Strasberg and Mamet who are criticizing the System of the acting of Constantine Stanislavski, are basically still holds his gaze and progressed to two different points from his approach. Both approaches have examined in terms of the changes they have made to the implementation of the study from the System and their aims and methods. The experience of using the Strasberg and Mamet versions of the workshop by the actor, the similarities and differences that can occur between the actor and the audience are experienced and the results are reported. The research aims to provide a practical contribution to the academic field about “magic if” exercise, since the method has many sources yet mamet’s acting approaches has very few.