Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Onurcan; İşler, Ozan; Doğruyol, Burak
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-05T20:59:12Z
dc.date.available2020-12-05T20:59:12Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0022-1031
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104050en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/3507
dc.description.abstractTwo opposing views define the debate on the moral principles underlying human behavior. One side argues a central role for five moral foundations (care, fairness, loyalty, authority, sanctity), while the other argues that two of these (care, fairness) capture the essence of human moral concerns. In an experiment comparing these two views, Wright and Baril (2011) found that conservatives under cognitive load devalue loyalty, authority and sanctity, and become more liberal. Their finding of common intuitive concern with care and fairness supports the two-foundation perspective. In two high-powered preregistered experiments (N = 3275), we used time-pressure to induce intuitive thinking and tested Wright and Baril's finding that “we are all liberals at heart.” Although the manipulations worked as intended, Study 1 failed to identify an effect on the moral foundations questionnaire (MFQ). We conjectured that familiarity with standard survey items may weaken intuition manipulations by eliciting stable opinions. In Study 2, we therefore used not only the MFQ but also novel moral foundations vignettes. Study 2 failed to find an effect of time-pressure on either questionnaire type. An internal Bayesian meta-analysis indicated strong evidence against an effect of intuitive thinking on moral foundations.en_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherAcademic Press Inc.en_US
dc.subjectCore foundationsen_US
dc.subjectIntuitive thinkingen_US
dc.subjectMoral foundations questionnaireen_US
dc.subjectMoral foundations vignettesen_US
dc.subjectTime-pressureen_US
dc.titleAre we at all liberal at heart? High-powered tests find no effect of intuitive thinking on moral foundationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Experimental Social Psychologyen_US
dc.identifier.volume92en_US
dc.identifier.wos000598059600002en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104050en_US
dc.contributor.khasauthorYılmaz, Onurcanen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record