Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorÜnver, Hamid Akın
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-29T19:25:52Z
dc.date.available2021-01-29T19:25:52Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1305-4740
dc.identifier.urihttps://app.trdizin.gov.tr/makale/TWpZeE5qVTBOQT09en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/3814
dc.description.abstractThis article makes an empirical exposition of militancy governance under state failure by focusing on ISIS (Islamic State in Iraq and Syria), YPG (People's Protection Units), Luhansk People's Republic and Donetsk People's Republic. Specifically, the article discusses how these groups mobilize different types of grievances and frame their propaganda to exert control over areas where states are weakened. Furthermore, how these groups engage in early modes of pre- and post-territorial control, form governance practices and prioritize particular areas for better administration are also elaborated in detail. Ultimately, the paper argues that Violent Non-State Actors (VNSAs) perform better in areas of low loyalty and high resource-generation and if its territorial ambitions are maximalist (expansionist). Through these variables, we are better able to judge how sustainable these groups will be in their respective territories and how should states approach local governance once these groups are defeated.en_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCivil Waren_US
dc.subjectNon-State Actorsen_US
dc.subjectGovernanceen_US
dc.subjectSyria-Iraqen_US
dc.subjectUkraineen_US
dc.titleMilitancy Governance under State Failure: Models of Legitimacy Contestation in Ungoverned Spacesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.startpage45en_US
dc.identifier.endpage83en_US
dc.relation.journalGüvenlik Stratejileri Dergisien_US
dc.identifier.issue26en_US
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.contributor.khasauthorÜnver, Hamid Akınen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record