Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAkpınar, Belhhan
dc.contributor.authorGüden, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorSanisoğlu, İlhan
dc.contributor.authorSağbaş, Ertan
dc.contributor.authorCaynak, Barış
dc.contributor.authorBayramoğlu, Zehra
dc.contributor.authorBayındır, Osman
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-27T08:01:05Z
dc.date.available2019-06-27T08:01:05Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.issn1098-3511en_US
dc.identifier.issn1522-6662en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/247
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare outcome in two groups of patients who were classified according to their risk groups and underwent coronary revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. Material and Methods: Between January 1996 and July 2000 480 cases that underwent coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) were included in a retrospective nonrandomized manner for study. Group I included 210 patients who were revascularized using off-pump techniques. Octopus 2 and 3 (Medtronic Inc. Minneapolis MN) were used for tissue stabilization. Group 2 included 270 cases who underwent CABG using CPB. Emergency cases combined operations reoperations and patients in cardiogenic shock were excluded. Demographic variables were comparable between two the groups. Using the Allegheny Clinic Risk Scoring Scale [Magovern 1996] patients in both groups were scored as low moderate and high risk. In Group 1 37% of patients consisted of high risk patients while Group 2 had 14% (p < 0.05) Student's t-test and chi-square test were used for statistical analysis and alfa < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Mortality was 1.4% in Group 1 and 1.5% in Group 2 (p = ns). Mean anastomosis per patient was 2.6 +/- 0.6 in Group 1 and 3.2 +/- 0.5 in Group 2 (p < 0.05). Patients in Group I needed less blood transfusions and less inotropic support postoperatively (p < 0.05). There were also fewer minor neurological events (p < 0.05) and pulmonary complications (Type 2) in Group 1. Atrial fibrillation rate infection and major neurological deficit (Type 1) were similar in both groups. Mortality was less among Group 1 high risk patients (3.9%) in comparison to Group 2 high risk patients (7.9%) but this did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: In low or moderate risk patients CABG can be performed safely with or without CPB. In high risk patients with several comorbidities off-pump CABG seems to be a safe and efficient method that can improve outcome.en_US]
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherForum Multimedia Publishing LLC.en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectN/Aen_US
dc.titleDoes off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery reduce mortality in high risk patients?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.identifier.startpage231en_US
dc.identifier.endpage236
dc.relation.journalThe Heart Surgery Forumen_US
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.volume4en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000171126400010en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0034799721en_US
dc.institutionauthorSanisoğlu, İlhanen_US
dc.institutionauthorSağbaş, Ertanen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.pmid11673143en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record