Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorKaraoğuz, Hüseyin Emrahen_US
dc.contributor.authorÇelenk, Bengü
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-25T13:29:49Z
dc.date.issued2022-06
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/4390
dc.description.abstractThis thesis aims to understand how the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) structured climate change and security discourses and institutionalized them in its practices between 2007-2021. In this regard, Maarten Hajer’s argumentative discourse analysis has been employed to assess how the UNSC structured and institutionalized these discourses. The study additionally formed a multilevel security framework to employ over both the processes of discourse structuring and institutionalizing in order to strengthen Hajer’s analysis and make the discourses on climate change and security more meaningful. Based on the analytical literature review, the multilevel security framework establishes causal chains among climate security, human security, national security, and international security. This research understands the UNSC’s process of structuring discourses on climate change and security to still be in the developmental phase. In the context of a multilevel security framework, the discourses on whether the discourses on climate change as an international security issue or not were observed to have not been structured yet. However, climate change was observed to have been structured as a security problem by establishing causal links between climate security, human security, and national security. The second part focuses on whether or not the UNSC has institutionalized climate change and security discourses in its practices. The findings show the UNSC to have partially institutionalized discourses on climate change and security. Despite the increase in the frequency of the relevant outputs and the number of members defending climate change and the UNSC’s relationship with it, the UNSC was found to have institutionalized the discourses on climate change and security in line with the discourses of the Russian Federation. In the context of the multilevel security framework, climate change was found to have been institutionalized as a security problem by establishing causal links between human security and national security. The answer to the question at the beginning of the thesis of whether the realist security-based nature of the UNSC as problematized has changed with regard to the level of global security is that it has not changed yet.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKadir Has Üniversitesien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectClimate Changeen_US
dc.subjectUnited Nations Security Councilen_US
dc.subjectUNSCen_US
dc.subjectSecurityen_US
dc.subjectMarteen Hajer’s Argumentative Discourse Analysisen_US
dc.subjectMulti-level Security Analysisen_US
dc.titleThe structuring and institutionalizing of discourses on climate change and security in the United Nations Security Councilen_US
dc.typedoctoralThesisen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-6899-4422en_US
dc.departmentEnstitüler, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, Uluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryTezen_US
dc.identifier.yoktezid740922en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record