Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAltin, Elif
dc.contributor.authorOkur, Nurdem
dc.contributor.authorYalcin, Esra
dc.contributor.authorEracikbas, Asude Firdevs
dc.contributor.authorAktan-Erciyes, Asli
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-19T15:11:46Z
dc.date.available2023-10-19T15:11:46Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.820702
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/5212
dc.description.abstractThe present study investigates the relations between L2-English proficiency and L1-Turkish lexical property evaluations. We asked whether L2 proficiency affects lexical properties, including imageability and concreteness ratings of 600 Turkish words selected from the Word Frequency Dictionary of Written Turkish. Seventy-two participants (L1-Turkish - L2-English) provided ratings of concreteness and imageability for 600 words on a 7-point scale. In order to assess their L2 proficiency, we administered Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-IV (PPVT-IV). We divided categories into two subcategories as high and low for the frequency, concreteness, imageability, and age of acquisition (AoA). The relationship between these subcategories and imageability-concreteness was examined by mixed effects linear regression analyses. We found that L2 proficiency and imageability ratings were positively correlated and specifically, this positive association was evident for low-frequency words and later acquired words. Results are in line with the interaction of bilingual representation under the dual-coding theory which suggests that bilinguals develop an interconnected imaginal representation for two languages as opposed to separate verbal representations. As L2 proficiency increased, the imageability also increased. These findings have implications for literature investigating the relationship between L2 proficiency and linguistic outcomes. Additionally, findings point to the importance of considering the L2 proficiency of participants when lexical tasks that involve cue words or word lists are used.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Media Saen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Psychologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAge-Of-AcquisitionEn_Us
dc.subjectWord-FrequencyEn_Us
dc.subjectContext AvailabilityEn_Us
dc.subjectImageability RatingsEn_Us
dc.subjectConcretenessEn_Us
dc.subjectImageryEn_Us
dc.subjectNormsEn_Us
dc.subjectFamiliarityEn_Us
dc.subjectAccessEn_Us
dc.subjectRecallEn_Us
dc.subjectbilingualismen_US
dc.subjectimageabilityen_US
dc.subjectconcretenessen_US
dc.subjectfrequencyen_US
dc.subjectL2 proficiencyen_US
dc.titleRelations Between L2 Proficiency and L1 Lexical Property Evaluationsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.departmentN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000778994600001en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2022.820702en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85127868583en_US
dc.institutionauthorN/A
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorwosidAktan Erciyes, Aslı/IWE-5157-2023
dc.identifier.pmid35369194en_US
dc.khas20231019-WoSen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record