Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCoban, M. Kerem
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-19T15:13:08Z
dc.date.available2023-10-19T15:13:08Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1541-132X
dc.identifier.issn1541-1338
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12526
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/5615
dc.description.abstractWe examine de facto autonomy across regulatory agencies and policy sectors. Yet not much is known whether, how and why de facto autonomy could vary across policy areas within the same policy sector. This article demonstrates the existence of such variation and suggests that this variation depends on the interplay between stakeholders' diverging (or overlapping) policy preferences, deficient (or superior) organizational policy capacity, and institutional arrangements leading to enabled (or constrained) de facto autonomy. Relying on elite interviews and secondary resources, this study builds on an illustrative study on bank regulation in Turkey in the post-GFC period and presents a nuanced understanding of de facto autonomy: a multi-policy area approach to de facto autonomy that allows us to examine variation in de facto autonomy across policy areas, the determinants of the variation, and whether de facto autonomy is constrained or enabled, which structures the regulatory policy process.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipLee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, NUSen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEarlier versions of this article were presented at the 5th International Conference on Public Policy and a seminar at LAGAPE, UNIL. I am grateful to participants' comments and suggestions on these occasions. I am grateful to Yannis Papadopoulos, Martino Maggetti, Emmanuelle Mathieu, Fulya Apaydin, Philipp Trein, Kutsal Yesilkagit, Yvonne Guo, Ramkishen S Rajan, Kurtulus Gemici, Razeen Sally, David Levi-Faur, Lucia Quaglia, Feng Qiushi, Michael Howlett, M. Ramesh, Kidjie Saguin, Bruno Q. Cunha, and Iftikhar Lodhi for their suggestions and comments on the earlier versions of this article. I am also grateful to three anonymous reviewers and the editors of the journal, whose insightful and stimulating observations and recommendations have improved the article substantially. Finally, as this article builds on my PhD thesis, I am grateful for NUS Research Scholarship that funded my doctoral studies at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, NUS.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofReview of Policy Researchen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectOrganizational AutonomyEn_Us
dc.subjectBureaucratic AutonomyEn_Us
dc.subjectFormal IndependenceEn_Us
dc.subjectGlobal DiffusionEn_Us
dc.subjectPoliticsEn_Us
dc.subjectDelegationEn_Us
dc.subjectAgenciesEn_Us
dc.subjectFinanceEn_Us
dc.subjectDesignEn_Us
dc.subjectAccessEn_Us
dc.subjectde facto autonomyen_US
dc.subjectinstitutional arrangementsen_US
dc.subjectorganizational policy capacityen_US
dc.subjectregulatory policy processen_US
dc.subjectstakeholder engagementen_US
dc.titleRethinking de facto autonomy? A multi-policy area approach and the regulatory policy processPalabras Clave(sic)(sic)(sic)en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.authoridCoban, Mehmet Kerem/0000-0003-3226-6340
dc.departmentN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000897958400001en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ropr.12526en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85144047905en_US
dc.institutionauthorCoban, M. Kerem
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorwosidCoban, Mehmet Kerem/N-2641-2014
dc.khas20231019-WoSen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record