Browsing by Author "Hashemkhani Zolfani, Sarfaraz"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Article Citation Count: 25EVALUATING LOGISTICS VILLAGES IN TURKEY USING HYBRID IMPROVED FUZZY SWARA (IMF SWARA) AND FUZZY MABAC TECHNIQUES(Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, 2021) Görçün, Ömer Faruk; Gorcun, Omer Faruk; Kucukonder, HandePositioning in the right location for organizing logistics activities is a determinative factor in the aspect of costs, effectivity, productivity, and performance of these operations carried out by logistics firms. The proper logistics village selection is a crucial, complicated, and time-consuming process for decision-makers who have to make the right and optimal decision on this issue. Decision-makers need a methodological frame with a practical algorithm that can be implemented quickly to solve these decision-making problems. Within this scope, the current paper aims to present an evaluation tool, which provides more reasonable and reliable results for decision-makers to solve the logistics village selection problem that is very complicated and has uncertain conditions based on fuzzy approaches. In this study, we propose the Improved Fuzzy Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (IMF SWARA), a modified and extended version of the traditional fuzzy Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (F-SWARA) to identify the criteria weights. Also, we suggest applying the fuzzy Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (F-MABAC) technique to determine the preference ratings of the alternatives. This combination has many valuable contributions. For example, it proposes to use a more reliable and consistent evaluation scale based on fuzzy sets. Hence, decision-makers can perform more reliable and reasonable pairwise comparisons by considering this evaluation scale. Besides, it presents a multi-attribute evaluation system based on the identified criteria weights. From this perspective, the proposed model is implemented to evaluate eight different logistics village alternatives with respect to nine selection criteria. According to the analysis results, while A8 is the most appropriate option, C1 Gross National Product (GNP) is the most significant criterion. A comprehensive sensitivity analysis was performed to test the robustness and validation of the proposed model, and the results of the analysis approve the validity and applicability of the proposed model. As a result, the suggested integrated MCDM framework can be applied as a valuable and practical decisionmaking tool to develop new strategies and improve the logistics operations by decision-makers.Article Citation Count: 9Evaluation of the Special Warehouse Handling Equipment (Turret Trucks) Using Integrated FUCOM and WASPAS Techniques Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Dombi Aggregation Operators(Springer Heidelberg, 2023) Görçün, Ömer Faruk; Gorcun, Omer Faruk; Kucukonder, HandeTurret trucks used for special warehousing operations have exceptional abilities, qualifications, and working principles than other warehousing handling equipment. Also, at the same time, if decision-makers cannot select as proper to needs, the cost of being idle of these kinds of machines is very high. According to the comprehensive literature review and the paper's findings, evaluating turret trucks is complex, complicated, and time-consuming for decision-makers, as many conflicting criteria and uncertainties affect the evaluation processes. Hence, it is required to employ a practical, powerful, and practical multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach that can handle ambiguities to solve these kinds of problems. For this purpose, the current paper proposes an extended version of a hybrid decision-making tool consisting of FUCOM (Full Consistency Method) and the WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment) technique with the help of the intuitionistic fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators. It can help to select the appropriate turret trucks that can help reduce the costs of remaining idle and provide economic effectivity of logistics and warehousing operations. According to the outcomes of the suggested model, the width, lift motor power and lift height of the turret trucks are the most critical and influential criteria, as they determine the corridor width, accordingly space utilization, warehousing capacity, and unit warehousing costs. Finally, the intuitionistic fuzzy model is applied to solve the turret truck selection problems. A comprehensive sensitivity analysis consisting of three phases was performed to test the validation of the proposed model and its obtained results. The sensitivity analysis results approve the proposed model's applicability and validity. Thus, the analysis results validated that the proposed approach is a robust and practical MCDM framework, and its results are accurate and reasonable.Article Citation Count: 1MCDM-Based Wildfire Risk Assessment: A Case Study on the State of Arizona(Mdpi, 2023) Pishahang, Mohammad; Jovcic, Stefan; Hashemkhani Zolfani, Sarfaraz; Simic, Vladimir; Goercuen, oemer Faruk; Zhu, Shaojun; Zhang, ChaoThe increasing frequency of wildfires has posed significant challenges to communities worldwide. The effectiveness of all aspects of disaster management depends on a credible estimation of the prevailing risk. Risk, the product of a hazard's likelihood and its potential consequences, encompasses the probability of hazard occurrence, the exposure of assets to these hazards, existing vulnerabilities that amplify the consequences, and the capacity to manage, mitigate, and recover from their consequences. This paper employs the multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework, which produces reliable results and allows for the customization of the relative importance of factors based on expert opinions. Utilizing the AROMAN algorithm, the study ranks counties in the state of Arizona according to their wildfire risk, drawing upon 25 factors categorized into expected annual loss, community resilience, and social vulnerability. A sensitivity analysis demonstrates the stability of the results when model parameters are altered, reinforcing the robustness of this approach in disaster risk assessment. While the paper primarily focuses on enhancing the safety of human communities in the context of wildfires, it highlights the versatility of the methodology, which can be applied to other natural hazards and accommodate more subjective risk and safety assessments.