The Relationship Between Economic Growth and Income Distribution in Turkey and the Turkish Republics of Central Asia and Caucasia: Dynamic Panel Data Analysis With Structural Breaks
Loading...
Date
2013
Authors
Mercan, Mehmet
Azer, Özlem Arzu
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
In this study the effect of economic growth on income distribution was tested using data from Central Asian and Caucasian countries’ economies (Azerbaijan Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan) and Turkish economy over the period of 1995 to 2009. New generation panel data methods which consider cross-section dependence and structural breaks among countries were used for the analysis. The results indicate that there exists co-integration among the series. We found that that the economic growth had a negative effect on the income distributions across the countries. In particular the results show that the economic growth improved the income distribution in Turkey and Azerbaijan. © 2013 Eurasia Business and Economics Society.
Description
Keywords
Gini Coefficient, Income Distribution, Panel Data Analysis with Structural Breaks, Transition Countries, Gini Coefficient, Income Distribution, Transition Countries, Panel Data Analysis with Structural Breaks
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
7
Source
Eurasian Economic Review
Volume
3
Issue
2
Start Page
165
End Page
182
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 6
Scopus : 4
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 19
SCOPUS™ Citations
4
checked on Feb 07, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
6
checked on Feb 07, 2026
Page Views
7
checked on Feb 07, 2026
Downloads
170
checked on Feb 07, 2026
Google Scholar™

OpenAlex FWCI
0.69386317
Sustainable Development Goals
5
GENDER EQUALITY

8
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH

9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

10
REDUCED INEQUALITIES


