Comparison of Intraoperative Transit-Time Flow Measurement With Early Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Flow Mapping - in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Surgery
Loading...
Date
2003
Authors
Sanisoğlu, İlhan
Güden, Mustafa
BalcI, Cem
SaĞbaŞ, Ertan
Duran, Cihan
AkpInar, Belhhan
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Texas Heart Inst.
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate graft patency of off-pump coronary artery surgery intraoperatively by transit-time flow measurement and to compare this technique with postoperative magnetic resonance flow mapping. Twenty patients (13 men and 7 women
mean age 67.9 +/- 76 yr) underwent off-pump coronary artery surgery. Intraoperative transit-time flow measurement of grafts was performed measuring maximum minimum and mean flows. For each graft the pulsatile index was calculated by dividing the difference between the maximum and the minimum flow by the mean flow. In the early postoperative period (1st week) magnetic resonance flow mapping was performed using phase contrast flow quantification. Mean intraoperative flow values and mean magnetic resonance flow mapping values were compared. At the same postoperative session contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography was performed to evaluate graft patency. In 20 patients a total of 49 coronary graft flows were assessed with intraoperative transit-time flow measurement and postoperative magnetic resonance flow mapping. Upon comparison there was a strong correlation between techniques with stable and statistically significant differences between the intraoperative and postoperative flow mapping values. One saphenous vein graft was revised intraoperatively due to graft failure. Our data suggest that the combined use of intraoperative transit-time flow measurement and postoperative magnetic resonance flow analysis has a potential role in the assessment of graft patency in off-pump coronary artery surgery although more study is required.
mean age 67.9 +/- 76 yr) underwent off-pump coronary artery surgery. Intraoperative transit-time flow measurement of grafts was performed measuring maximum minimum and mean flows. For each graft the pulsatile index was calculated by dividing the difference between the maximum and the minimum flow by the mean flow. In the early postoperative period (1st week) magnetic resonance flow mapping was performed using phase contrast flow quantification. Mean intraoperative flow values and mean magnetic resonance flow mapping values were compared. At the same postoperative session contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography was performed to evaluate graft patency. In 20 patients a total of 49 coronary graft flows were assessed with intraoperative transit-time flow measurement and postoperative magnetic resonance flow mapping. Upon comparison there was a strong correlation between techniques with stable and statistically significant differences between the intraoperative and postoperative flow mapping values. One saphenous vein graft was revised intraoperatively due to graft failure. Our data suggest that the combined use of intraoperative transit-time flow measurement and postoperative magnetic resonance flow analysis has a potential role in the assessment of graft patency in off-pump coronary artery surgery although more study is required.
Description
Keywords
Blood flow velocity, Graft occlusion, Vascular/diagnosis, Hemorheology/instrumentation, Magnetic resonance angiography, Prospective studies, Rheology/methods, coronary artery surgery, Male, Time Factors, correlation analysis, Coronary Artery Disease, postoperative period, Graft occlusion, gadolinium chelate, coronary artery blood flow, saphenous vein graft, Prospective Studies, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, Coronary Artery Bypass, Aged, 80 and over, clinical article, adult, article, graft patency, Middle Aged, Coronary Arteriosclerosis, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, gadolinium pentetate, aged, blood flow velocity, female, Pulsatile Flow, contrast enhancement, Female, Blood Flow Velocity, graft failure, Blood flow velocity, Hemorheology/instrumentation, surgical technique, male, coronary artery bypass graft, Vascular/diagnosis, Monitoring, Intraoperative, intraoperative period, Humans, controlled study, human, intermethod comparison, Vascular Patency, Aged, Postoperative Care, magnetic resonance angiography, Reproducibility of Results, Magnetic resonance angiography, Rheology/methods, Hemorheology, Prospective studies, Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Fields of Science
0302 clinical medicine, 03 medical and health sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Q4
Scopus Q
Q3

OpenCitations Citation Count
8
Source
Texas Heart Institute journal
Volume
30
Issue
1
Start Page
31
End Page
37
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 10
PubMed : 3
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 13
Web of Science™ Citations
9
checked on Feb 10, 2026
Page Views
5
checked on Feb 10, 2026
Downloads
150
checked on Feb 10, 2026
Google Scholar™


