Nutrient Dynamics in Flooded Wetlands. Ii: Model Application

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2013

Authors

Kalın, Latif
Hantush, Mohamed M.
Işık, Sabahattin
Yücekaya, Ahmet
Jordan, T.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

Yes

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

Yes
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Average
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

In this paper the authors applied and evaluated the wetland nutrient model that was described in Paper I. Hydrologic and water quality data from a small restored wetland located on Kent Island Maryland which is part of the Delmarva Peninsula on the eastern shores of the Chesapeake Bay was used for this purpose. The model was assessed through various methods against the observed data in simulating nitrogen (N) phosphorus (P) and total suspended sediment (TSS) dynamics. Time series plots of observed and simulated concentrations and loads generally compared well
better performance was demonstrated with dissolved forms of nitrogen i.e.ammonia and nitrate. Through qualitative and quantitative sensitivity analysis dominant processes in the study wetland were scrutinized. Nitrification plant uptake and mineralization were the most important processes affecting ammonia. Denitrification in the sediment layer and diffusion to bottom sediments were identified as key processes for nitrate. Settling and resuspension were the most important processes for particulate matter (organic N sediment) and sediment-bound phosphate (inorganic P). Order of parameter sensitivities and dominant processes exhibited seasonality. Uncertainty bands created from Monte Carlo simulations showed that parameter uncertainty is relatively small
however uncertainty in the wetland inflow rates and loading concentrations have much more bearing on model predictive uncertainty. N P and TSS mass balance analysis showed that the wetland removed approximately 23 33 and 46% respectively of the incoming load (runoff + atmospheric deposition) over the two-year period with more removal in year 1 (34 43 and 55% respectively) which had a long stretch of a dry period. The developed model can be employed for exploring wetland response to various climatic and input conditions and for deeper understanding of key processes in wetlands.

Description

Keywords

Floods, Wetlands, Water quality, Sediment, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Nitrification, Denitrification, Ammonia, Nitrates, Vegetation, Chesapeake Bay, Wetland, Water quality, Model, Sediment, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Nitrification, Denitrification, Ammonia, Nitrate, Algae, Plant growth, Nitrates, Vegetation, Algae, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Chesapeake Bay, Nitrate, Nitrification, Floods, Water quality, Ammonia, Wetlands, Wetland, Denitrification, Sediment, Model, Plant growth

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Fields of Science

0208 environmental biotechnology, 0207 environmental engineering, 02 engineering and technology

Citation

WoS Q

Q3

Scopus Q

Q3
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
8

Source

Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

Volume

18

Issue

12

Start Page

1724

End Page

1738
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 5

Scopus : 13

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 36

SCOPUS™ Citations

13

checked on Feb 03, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

12

checked on Feb 03, 2026

Downloads

105

checked on Feb 03, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
1.58268727

Sustainable Development Goals

6

CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION
CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION Logo

7

AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY Logo

8

DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH Logo

11

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES Logo

13

CLIMATE ACTION
CLIMATE ACTION Logo

15

LIFE ON LAND
LIFE ON LAND Logo

17

PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS Logo