Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShaikh, Mohammad A.
dc.contributor.authorKüçükvar, Murat
dc.contributor.authorOnat, Nuri Cihat
dc.contributor.authorKirkil, Gökhan
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-27T08:01:15Z
dc.date.available2019-06-27T08:01:15Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn0360-5442en_US
dc.identifier.issn1873-6785en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/316
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.124
dc.description.abstractWhile carbon footprint reduction potential and energy security aspects of renewable and non-renewable resources are widely considered in energy policy their effects on water resources are mostly overlooked. This research aims to develop a framework for water and carbon footprint analysis to estimate the current and future trends of water consumption and withdrawal by electricity production sectors for national energy development plans - alongside carbon emissions from various electricity sources. With this motivation the Turkish electric power industry is selected as a case study and a decision support tool is developed to determine the water consumption withdrawal and carbon emissions from energy mixes under three different scenarios namely Business-As-Usual (BAU) Official Governmental Plan (OGP) and Renewable Energy-Focused Development Plan (REFDP). The results indicate that water is used substantially even by renewable resources such as hydroelectricity and biomass which are generally considered to be more environmental friendly than other energy sources. The average water consumption of the OGP energy mix in 2030 is estimated to be about 8.1% and 9.6% less than that of the BAU and REFDP scenarios respectively. On the other hand it is found that the water withdrawal of the energy mix in 2030 under the REFDP scenario is about 46.3% and 16.9% less than that of BAU and OGP scenarios. Carbon emissions from BAU are projected to be 24% higher than OGP and 39% higher than REFDP in 2030. Carbon emissions and water usage are strongly correlated in BAU scenario as compared with OGP and REFDP thus carbon friendly energy sources will result in fewer water consumptions and withdrawals particularly under REFDP. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US]
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltden_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectWater and carbon footprinten_US
dc.subjectElectricity productionen_US
dc.subjectScenario analysisen_US
dc.subjectEnergy policyen_US
dc.subjectDecision support toolen_US
dc.titleA framework for water and carbon footprint analysis of national electricity production scenariosen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.identifier.startpage406en_US
dc.identifier.endpage421
dc.relation.journalEnergyen_US
dc.identifier.volume139en_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi, Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000414879500032en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.124en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85027287003en_US
dc.institutionauthorKirkil, Gökhanen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record