Evaluation of Public Transportation Systems for Sustainable Cities Using an Integrated Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Model

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2023

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Average
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

In this era of increasing demand for mobility and rapid urban growth, there is a pressing need for a public transit system that is safe, fast, reliable, well-connected, and sustainable. Furthermore, it is essential to reduce the external costs associated with urban transportation, including environmental pollution, noise, congestion, and accidents, to foster sustainable cities. Choosing the right urban transportation system can meet this goal, but it is not an accessible business for decision-makers in the face of several conflicting criteria and ambiguities in the evaluation process. To cope with this, the current paper suggests a multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) framework consisting of fuzzy BWM (Best-Worst method) and fuzzy MAIRCIA (Multi-Attribute Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis) techniques. This extended MCGDM approach has been applied to evaluate six urban transport systems, namely, Trams, Light Rail Trams, Metro (Subway), Bus Rapid Transport, Commuter Trains, and Public Buses based on 11 selection criteria which we have determined after consultation with highly experienced professionals. The fuzzy BWM technique is employed to identify the weights of the criteria. The fuzzy MAIRCA technique is utilized for ranking the alternatives using the calculated weights of the criteria. The proposed approach's validation has been examined with an extensive robustness check. The study is conducted from a general perspective, i.e., not restricted to a particular city. However, with the identified selection criteria, the proposed decision-making procedure can be repeated for a specific city considering any specific requirements, constraints, or limitations of that city.

Description

Keywords

Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making, Urban Transportation, Public Transport Systems, Sustainability, Mobility, Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making, Mcdm Approach, Distance, Framework, Multi-criteria group decision-making, Projects, Urban transportation, Topsis, Public transport systems, Urban Transportation, Sustainability, Public Transport Systems, Strategies, Support, Selection

Fields of Science

05 social sciences, 02 engineering and technology, 0502 economics and business, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
14

Source

Environment, Development and Sustainability

Volume

26

Issue

11

Start Page

27655

End Page

27684
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 5

Scopus : 19

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 34

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
5.8981

Sustainable Development Goals