Evaluation of Public Transportation Systems for Sustainable Cities Using an Integrated Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Model
Loading...

Date
2023
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
In this era of increasing demand for mobility and rapid urban growth, there is a pressing need for a public transit system that is safe, fast, reliable, well-connected, and sustainable. Furthermore, it is essential to reduce the external costs associated with urban transportation, including environmental pollution, noise, congestion, and accidents, to foster sustainable cities. Choosing the right urban transportation system can meet this goal, but it is not an accessible business for decision-makers in the face of several conflicting criteria and ambiguities in the evaluation process. To cope with this, the current paper suggests a multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) framework consisting of fuzzy BWM (Best-Worst method) and fuzzy MAIRCIA (Multi-Attribute Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis) techniques. This extended MCGDM approach has been applied to evaluate six urban transport systems, namely, Trams, Light Rail Trams, Metro (Subway), Bus Rapid Transport, Commuter Trains, and Public Buses based on 11 selection criteria which we have determined after consultation with highly experienced professionals. The fuzzy BWM technique is employed to identify the weights of the criteria. The fuzzy MAIRCA technique is utilized for ranking the alternatives using the calculated weights of the criteria. The proposed approach's validation has been examined with an extensive robustness check. The study is conducted from a general perspective, i.e., not restricted to a particular city. However, with the identified selection criteria, the proposed decision-making procedure can be repeated for a specific city considering any specific requirements, constraints, or limitations of that city.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making, Urban Transportation, Public Transport Systems, Sustainability, Mobility, Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making, Mcdm Approach, Distance, Framework, Multi-criteria group decision-making, Projects, Urban transportation, Topsis, Public transport systems, Urban Transportation, Sustainability, Public Transport Systems, Strategies, Support, Selection
Fields of Science
05 social sciences, 02 engineering and technology, 0502 economics and business, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
14
Source
Environment, Development and Sustainability
Volume
26
Issue
11
Start Page
27655
End Page
27684
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 5
Scopus : 19
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 34
Google Scholar™


