How People Can Become Persuaded by Weak Messages Presented by Credible Communicators: Not All Sleeper Effects Are Created Equal
Loading...
Date
2017
Authors
Albarracin, Dolores
Kumkale, Gökçe Tarcan
Vento, Patrick Poyner-Del
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
The sleeper effect has been proposed to describe temporal changes in persuasion for messages associated with noncredible sources. The present research introduces a new kind of sleeper effect denoting increases in persuasion for weak messages associated with credible sources. This effect of the source was hypothesized to derive from attending to the message source rather than the message arguments and reconstructing delayed attitudes primarily on the basis of the source information. Findings from three experiments revealed that when the focus of attention was the communicator there was a sleeper effect for the source. Specifically during the time between an immediate follow up and a delayed follow up persuasion increased when credible sources presented weak arguments. In contrast when the focus of attention was the message arguments a traditional sleeper effect emerged. That is persuasion increased when strong arguments were presented by a noncredible communicator. These effects were mediated by relative recall of arguments versus source attributes and replicated with different message topics and lengths of delay. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc.
Description
Keywords
Sleeper effect, Attitude stability, Persuasion, Persistence, Memory, Attitude change, Persistence, Sleeper effect, Memory, Persuasion, Attitude stability, Attitude change
Fields of Science
05 social sciences, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
17
Source
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume
68
Issue
Start Page
171
End Page
180
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 2
Scopus : 24
PubMed : 9
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 97
SCOPUS™ Citations
24
checked on Feb 19, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
21
checked on Feb 19, 2026
Page Views
5
checked on Feb 19, 2026
Downloads
197
checked on Feb 19, 2026
Google Scholar™


