Examining Actor-Partner Effects Between Social Dominance, Relationship Power, Sexism, and Marital Quality

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2023

Authors

Ymamgulyyeva, Aysoltan
Kafescioglu, Niluefer
Harma, Mehmet

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley

Open Access Color

HYBRID

Green Open Access

Yes

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Average

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the actor-partner effects of attitudes toward group-based inequality as measured by social dominance orientation (SDO) and marital quality, and the indirect actor-partner effects of SDO on marital quality via ambivalent sexism and partners' perceptions of their own relationship power toward their partner. Background: Previous research suggests that certain social attitudes play a role in relationship processes. However, it is unclear whether broader views on social inequality could have an effect on partners' marital quality. Method: Ninety heterosexual married couples in Turkey (N = 180) responded via an online survey on SDO, marital quality, relationship power, and ambivalent sexism. Actorpartner interdependence model (APIM) and actor-partner interdependence model of mediation (APIMeM) were conducted to examine the direct and indirect actor-partner effects. Results: For indirect effects, men's SDO was negatively associated with their marital quality through their relationship power and hostile sexism. No significant indirect effects were found for women. However, women's relationship power was positively and their benevolent sexism was negatively associated with their own and their partners' marital quality. Conclusion: Our findings help develop a more comprehensive understanding of how the political, social, and personal aspects of our lives are connected with one another. Implications: Our study points to the importance of exploring the topic of men's and women's views toward social inequality and its effects on their close relationships in clinical practice and relational education.

Description

Keywords

Ambivalent Sexism, Benevolent Sexism, Dyadic Adjustment, Mens Hostile, Gender, Orientation, Satisfaction, Antecedents, Perceptions, Inventory, Ambivalent Sexism, Benevolent Sexism, Dyadic Adjustment, Mens Hostile, Gender, Orientation, dyadic analysis, Satisfaction, marital quality, Antecedents, relationship power, Perceptions, sexism, Inventory, social dominance orientation, Antecedents, Mens Hostile, relationship power, Dyadic Adjustment, Inventory, Sexism, Gender, Satisfaction, Dyadic analysis, marital quality, Relationship power, Marital quality, Benevolent Sexism, Orientation, dyadic analysis, Perceptions, Social dominance orientation, Ambivalent Sexism, sexism, social dominance orientation

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

Q1

Scopus Q

Q2
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
1

Source

Family Relations

Volume

73

Issue

Start Page

1311

End Page

1328
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 1

Scopus : 2

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 13

SCOPUS™ Citations

3

checked on Mar 03, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

3

checked on Mar 03, 2026

Page Views

2

checked on Mar 03, 2026

Downloads

213

checked on Mar 03, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
1.0111

Sustainable Development Goals