How To Activate Intuitive and Reflective Thinking in Behavior Research? a Comprehensive Examination of Experimental Techniques

dc.authorid Isler, Ozan/0000-0002-4638-2230
dc.authorwosid Yilmaz, Onurcan/I-3839-2019
dc.contributor.author Isler, Ozan
dc.contributor.author Yılmaz, Onurcan
dc.contributor.author Yilmaz, Onurcan
dc.contributor.other Psychology
dc.date.accessioned 2023-10-19T15:12:44Z
dc.date.available 2023-10-19T15:12:44Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.department-temp [Isler, Ozan] Univ Queensland, Sch Econ, St Lucia, Qld, Australia; [Yilmaz, Onurcan] Kadir Has Univ, Dept Psychol, Istanbul, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract Experiments comparing intuitive and reflective decisions provide insights into the cognitive foundations of human behavior. However, the relative strengths and weaknesses of the frequently used experimental techniques for activating intuition and reflection remain unknown. In a large-scale preregistered online experiment (N = 3667), we compared the effects of eight reflection, six intuition, and two within-subjects manipulations on actual and self-reported measures of cognitive performance. Compared to the overall control, the long debiasing training was the most effective technique for increasing actual reflection scores, and the emotion induction was the most effective technique for increasing actual intuition scores. In contrast, the reason and the intuition recall, the reason induction, and the brief time delay conditions failed to achieve the intended effects. We recommend using the debiasing training, the decision justification, or the monetary incentives technique to activate reflection, and the emotion induction, the cognitive load, or the time pressure technique to activate intuition. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship CAUL; Think Forward Initiative; ING Bank; Deloitte; Dell Technologies; Amazon Web Services; IBM; Center for Economic Policy Research-CEPR en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions. This research has been supported by the Think Forward Initiative (a partnership between ING Bank, Deloitte, Dell Technologies, Amazon Web Services, IBM, and the Center for Economic Policy Research-CEPR). The views and opinions expressed in this paper are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Think Forward Initiative or any of its partners. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 8
dc.identifier.doi 10.3758/s13428-022-01984-4 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1554-351X
dc.identifier.issn 1554-3528
dc.identifier.pmid 36253601 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85140018572 en_US
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q1
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01984-4
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/5521
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000869348300004 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality Q1
dc.khas 20231019-WoS en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Behavior Research Methods en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 26
dc.subject Dual-Process Theories En_Us
dc.subject Cognitive Reflection En_Us
dc.subject Analytic Thinking En_Us
dc.subject Time-Pressure En_Us
dc.subject Decision Justification En_Us
dc.subject Registered Replication En_Us
dc.subject Cooperative Behavior En_Us
dc.subject Social Desirability En_Us
dc.subject Increases Belief En_Us
dc.subject Response-Time En_Us
dc.subject Dual-Process Theories
dc.subject Cognitive Reflection
dc.subject Intuition en_US
dc.subject Analytic Thinking
dc.subject Reflection en_US
dc.subject Time-Pressure
dc.subject Debiasing training en_US
dc.subject Decision Justification
dc.subject Induction en_US
dc.subject Registered Replication
dc.subject Recall en_US
dc.subject Cooperative Behavior
dc.subject Time limits en_US
dc.subject Social Desirability
dc.subject Justification en_US
dc.subject Increases Belief
dc.subject Cognitive load en_US
dc.subject Response-Time
dc.subject Monetary incentives en_US
dc.title How To Activate Intuitive and Reflective Thinking in Behavior Research? a Comprehensive Examination of Experimental Techniques en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 22
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 9871d16b-164e-4f1d-b0e5-8eef999e6b38
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9871d16b-164e-4f1d-b0e5-8eef999e6b38
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 9390486a-b1dc-46cf-ad5f-31415f0c8b95
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9390486a-b1dc-46cf-ad5f-31415f0c8b95

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
5521.pdf
Size:
1.71 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Tam Metin / Full Text