Evaluation of irrigation methods in Soke Plain with HF-AHP-PROMETHEE II hybrid MCDM method
dc.authorwosid | Ulker, Duygu/AAD-1671-2020 | |
dc.contributor.author | Samanlıoğlu, Funda | |
dc.contributor.author | Samanlıoğlu, Funda | |
dc.contributor.author | Ulker, Duygu | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-19T15:11:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-19T15:11:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.department-temp | [Burak, Selmin; Ulker, Duygu] Istanbul Univ, Inst Marine Sci & Management, TR-34134 Istanbul, Turkey; [Samanlioglu, Funda] Kadir Has Univ, Fac Engn & Nat Sci, TR-34083 Istanbul, Turkey | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Soke Plain (Turkey) is one of the two plains where cotton production is the highest in Turkey, the leading country for cotton production in the Mediterranean Basin. The cropping pattern in Soke Plain is dominated by cotton with a ratio of 97%. The overall irrigation scheme is equipped with conventional systems (i.e., surface, furrow) whose efficiency is approximately 50% due to high evaporation and physical losses. Water efficiency improve-ment in cotton irrigation necessitates a thorough evaluation of the agricultural water management for Soke Plain, a water-scarce region under drought threat. In this paper, a hybrid multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method is presented for the evaluation and selection of irrigation methods. This process involves various potentially conflicting qualitative and quantitative criteria, therefore, a hybrid MCDM method such as HF-AHP-PROMETHEE II is needed to make decisions. In HF-AHP-PROMETHEE II, Hesitant Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (HF-AHP) is first implemented to determine importance weights of criteria and then Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enriching Evaluations II (HF-PROMETHEE II) is utilized to assess and rank the irrigation method alternatives. For comparison analysis, HF-AHP-TOPSIS (HF-AHP-Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method is also implemented to the same problem. A case study is presented where five irrigation method alternatives in Soke Plain are assessed by five expert decision-makers (DMs), based on fifteen evaluation criteria. Sprinkler is found to be the first ranked irrigation method among five alternatives with both HF-AHP-PROMETHEE II and HF-AHP-TOPSIS resulting in the same ranking. The selection of this irrigation technique by the expert DMs is compliant with prevailing regional features related to hydro-logic, climatic, environmental conditions and with regard to cotton, one of the highest water-consuming crops. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [FKZ02WGR1422E] | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work is a follow-up of the InoCottonGROW-So?ke project (project number FKZ02WGR1422E) which was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, with the contri-bution of Istanbul University Technology Transfer Application and Research Centre, Turkey as a project partner. The authors convey their thanks to the Decision Makers Messrs. Yusuf Binici (DSI, 14th Regional Directorate/Ayd?n) , O?mer YILDIZ and Nuri YAGCI (So?ke Plain IA) , Ayd?n ?elik (Ayd?n Directorate of Provin-cial Agriculture and Forestry) and Ms. ?ag?la PINAR AKILLI (So?ke Chamber of Agriculture) , for their participation as decision-makers in the process. The Author thanks to each reviewer for his/her valuable contribu-tions to make this manuscript improved. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | 13 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107810 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0378-3774 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1873-2283 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0378-3774 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1873-2283 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85133895281 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107810 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/5123 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 271 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000830892300006 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | |
dc.khas | 20231019-WoS | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Agricultural Water Management | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Group Decision-Making | En_Us |
dc.subject | Water-Use Efficiency | En_Us |
dc.subject | Analytic Hierarchy Process | En_Us |
dc.subject | Linguistic Term Sets | En_Us |
dc.subject | Fuzzy Ahp | En_Us |
dc.subject | Multicriteria Analysis | En_Us |
dc.subject | Intelligent Approach | En_Us |
dc.subject | Management | En_Us |
dc.subject | Resources | En_Us |
dc.subject | Selection | En_Us |
dc.subject | Group Decision-Making | |
dc.subject | Water-Use Efficiency | |
dc.subject | Analytic Hierarchy Process | |
dc.subject | Linguistic Term Sets | |
dc.subject | Fuzzy Ahp | |
dc.subject | Cotton irrigation methods | en_US |
dc.subject | Multicriteria Analysis | |
dc.subject | MCDM | en_US |
dc.subject | Intelligent Approach | |
dc.subject | AHP | en_US |
dc.subject | Management | |
dc.subject | PROMETHEE II | en_US |
dc.subject | Resources | |
dc.subject | TOPSIS | en_US |
dc.subject | Selection | |
dc.subject | Soke Plain | en_US |
dc.title | Evaluation of irrigation methods in Soke Plain with HF-AHP-PROMETHEE II hybrid MCDM method | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 4e74c274-0592-4792-ac57-00061bd273aa | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 4e74c274-0592-4792-ac57-00061bd273aa |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- 5123.pdf
- Size:
- 3.44 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Tam Metin / Full Text