Performance Analysis of Saccades for Primary and Confirmatory Target Selection

dc.authoridBatmaz, Anil Ufuk/0000-0001-7948-8093
dc.authoridStuerzlinger, Wolfgang/0000-0002-7110-5024
dc.authorwosidBatmaz, Anil Ufuk/ABE-7803-2021
dc.contributor.authorBatmaz, Anıl Ufuk
dc.contributor.authorBatmaz, Anil Ufuk
dc.contributor.authorMughrabi, Moaaz Hudhud
dc.contributor.authorStuerzlinger, Wolfgang
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-19T15:11:33Z
dc.date.available2023-10-19T15:11:33Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.department-temp[Mutasim, Aunnoy K.] Simon Fraser Univ, Sch Interact Arts Technol SIAT, Vancouver, BC, Canada; [Batmaz, Anil Ufuk] Concordia Univ, Comp Sci & Software Engn Dept, Montreal, PQ, Canada; [Mughrabi, Moaaz Hudhud] Kadir Has Univ, Mech Engn Dept, Istanbul, Turkey; [Stuerzlinger, Wolfgang] Simon Fraser Univ, Sch Interact Arts & Technol SIAT, Vancouver, BC, Canadaen_US
dc.description28th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST) -- NOV 29-DEC 01, 2022 -- Tsukuba, JAPANen_US
dc.description.abstractIn eye-gaze-based selection, dwell suffers from several issues, e.g., the Midas Touch problem. Here we investigate saccade-based selection techniques as an alternative to dwell. First, we designed a novel user interface (UI) for Actigaze and used it with ( goal-crossing) saccades for confirming the selection of small targets (i.e., < 1.5-2 degrees). We compared it with three other variants of Actigaze (with button press, dwell, and target reverse crossing) and two variants of target magnification (with button press and dwell). Magnification-dwell exhibited the most promising performance. For Actigaze, goal-crossing was the fastest option but suffered the most errors. We then evaluated goal-crossing as a primary selection technique for normal-sized targets (>= 2 degrees) and implemented a novel UI for such interaction. Results revealed that dwell achieved the best performance. Yet, we identified goal-crossing as a good compromise between dwell and button press. Our findings thus identify novel options for gaze-only interaction.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAssoc Comp Machinery,ACM SIGCHI,ACM SIGGRAPHen_US
dc.identifier.citation2
dc.identifier.doi10.1145/3562939.3565619en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-4503-9889-3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85143613544en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1145/3562939.3565619
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/5087
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001066110500018en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.khas20231019-WoSen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAssoc Computing Machineryen_US
dc.relation.ispartof28th Acm Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, Vrst 2022en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectFitts LawEn_Us
dc.subjectEye-Gaze Trackingen_US
dc.subjectEyeEn_Us
dc.subjectSmall Targetsen_US
dc.subjectSelection Techniquesen_US
dc.subjectVirtual Realityen_US
dc.subjectGazeEn_Us
dc.subjectFitts' Lawen_US
dc.subjectThroughputen_US
dc.subjectFitts Law
dc.subjectActivation Methodsen_US
dc.subjectEye
dc.subjectSaccadeen_US
dc.subjectGaze
dc.subjectTarget Reverse Crossingen_US
dc.titlePerformance Analysis of Saccades for Primary and Confirmatory Target Selectionen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb12eff7e-174d-4ce0-839b-71d7ea11e4f5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryb12eff7e-174d-4ce0-839b-71d7ea11e4f5

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
5087.pdf
Size:
925.47 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Tam Metin / Full Text