Detection of Click Spamming in Mobile Advertising

dc.authorscopusid 57485533600
dc.authorscopusid 47161046600
dc.authorscopusid 57485533700
dc.contributor.author Kaya, S.Ş.
dc.contributor.author Çavdaroğlu, Burak
dc.contributor.author Çavdaroğlu, B.
dc.contributor.author Şensoy, K.S.
dc.contributor.other Industrial Engineering
dc.date.accessioned 2023-10-19T15:05:23Z
dc.date.available 2023-10-19T15:05:23Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.department-temp Kaya, S.Ş., Department of Industrial Engineering, Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey; Çavdaroğlu, B., Department of Industrial Engineering, Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey; Şensoy, K.S., App Samurai Inc, San Francisco, CA, United States en_US
dc.description 13th Balkan Conference on Operational Research, BALCOR 2018 --25 May 2018 through 28 May 2018 -- --273699 en_US
dc.description.abstract Most of the marketing expenditures in mobile advertising are conducted through real-time bidding (RTB) marketplaces, in which ad spaces of the sellers (publishers) are auctioned for the impression of the buyers’ (advertisers) mobile apps. One of the most popular pricing models in RTB marketplaces is cost-per-install (CPI). In a CPI campaign, publishers place mobile ads of the highest bidders in their mobile apps and are paid by advertisers only if the advertised app is installed by a user. CPI pricing model causes some publishers to conduct an infamous fraudulent activity, known as click spamming. A click spamming publisher executes clicks for lots of users who have not authentically made them. If one of these users hears about the advertised app organically (say, via TV commercial) afterwards and installs it, this install will be attributed to the click spamming publisher. In this study, we propose a novel multiple testing procedure which can identify click spamming activities using the data of click-to-install time (CTIT), the time difference between the click of a mobile app’s ad and the first launch of the app after the install. We statistically show that our procedure has a false-positive error rate of 5% in the worst case. Finally, we run an experiment with 30 publishers, half of which are fraudulent. According to the results of the experiment, all non-fraudulent publishers are correctly identified and 73% of the fraudulent publishers are successfully detected. © 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 1
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/978-3-030-21990-1_15 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 263 en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 9783030219895
dc.identifier.issn 2198-7246
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85090798909 en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 251 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21990-1_15
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/4864
dc.khas 20231019-Scopus en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer Science and Business Media B.V. en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Konferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 1
dc.subject Click spamming en_US
dc.subject Fraud detection en_US
dc.subject Mobile advertising en_US
dc.subject Multiple testing en_US
dc.title Detection of Click Spamming in Mobile Advertising en_US
dc.type Conference Object en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 4754d84b-e228-4ca2-bc38-5de3c3a62004
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 4754d84b-e228-4ca2-bc38-5de3c3a62004
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 28868d0c-e9a4-4de1-822f-c8df06d2086a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 28868d0c-e9a4-4de1-822f-c8df06d2086a

Files