Treatment prediction with machine learning in prostate cancer patients

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2023

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Average
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

There are various treatment modalities for prostate cancer, which has a high incidence. In this study, it is aimed to make predictions with machine learning in order to determine the optimal treatment option for prostate cancer patients. The study included 88 male patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. Independent variables were determined as Gleason scores, biopsy, PSA, SUVmax, and age. Prostate cancer treatments, which are dependent variables, were determined as hormone therapy(n = 30), radiotherapy(n = 28) and radiotherapy + hormone therapy(n = 30). Machine learning was carried out in the Python with SVM, RF, DT, ETC and XGBoost. Metrics such as accuracy, ROC curve, and AUC were used to evaluate the performance of multi-class predictions. The model with the highest number of successful predictions was the XGBoost. False negative rates for hormone therapy, radiotherapy, and radiotherapy + hormone therapy treatments were, respectively, 12.5, 33.3, and 0%. The accuracy values were computed as 0.61, 0.83, 0.83, 0.72 and 0.89 for SVM, RF, DT, ETC and XGBoost, respectively. The three features that had the greatest influence on the treatment model prediction for prostate cancer with XGBoost were biopsy, Gleason score (3 + 3), and PSA level, respectively. According to the AUC, ROC and accuracy, it was determined that the XGBoost was the model that made the best estimation of prostate cancer treatment. Among the variables biopsy, Gleason score, and PSA level are identified as key variables in prediction of treatment.

Description

alcin, goksel/0000-0003-2268-9606

Keywords

Prostate cancer, support vector machine, random forest, decision tree, machine learning, Male, Prostate cancer, Prostatic Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Machine Learning, machine learning, Treatment Outcome, ROC Curve, Area Under Curve, decision tree, Humans, support vector machine, Neoplasm Grading, random forest, Aged

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

Q4

Scopus Q

Q3
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A

Source

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

Volume

28

Issue

Start Page

572

End Page

580
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 3

Scopus : 5

PubMed : 2

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 8

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
2.69899988

Sustainable Development Goals