Comparing Task-Based Instruction and Traditional Instruction on Task Engagement and Vocabulary Development in Secondary Language Education
Loading...

Date
2018
Authors
Page, Merve Halici
Mede, Enisa
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Routledge Journals Taylor & Francis Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the impact of task-based instruction (TBI) and traditional instruction (TI) on the motivation and vocabulary development in secondary language education. The focus of the study was to also find out the perceptions of teachers about implementing these two instructional methods in their teaching practices. The participants were 97 students and 2 teachers engaged in the 7th grade EFL program at a private school in Istanbul Turkey. Data was collected quantitatively from a vocabulary check test and motivation scale as well as qualitatively from semi-structured interviews. The findings revealed that implementing TBI had positive impact on students' vocabulary development as well as their motivation. In line with these findings it was also suggested that teachers perceived TBI to be a more effective method to be incorporated in secondary grade language practices. Based on the gathered findings suggestions for redesigning and implementing the existing 7th grade EFL program were provided.
Description
Keywords
EFL, student motivation, Task-based instruction, teachers' perceptions, traditional instruction, vocabulary development, vocabulary development, EFL, Task-based instruction, traditional instruction, student motivation, teachers' perceptions
Fields of Science
0602 languages and literature, 05 social sciences, 06 humanities and the arts, 0503 education
Citation
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
10
Source
The Journal of Educational Research
Volume
111
Issue
3
Start Page
371
End Page
381
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 3
Scopus : 13
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 75
Google Scholar™


