Optimizing Exoskeleton Design with Evolutionary Computation: An Intensive Survey

dc.contributor.authorStroppa, Fabıo
dc.contributor.authorSoylemez, Aleyna
dc.contributor.authorYuksel, Huseyin Taner
dc.contributor.authorAkbas, Baris
dc.contributor.authorSarac, Mine
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-19T15:12:06Z
dc.date.available2023-10-19T15:12:06Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.department-temp[Stroppa, Fabio; Soylemez, Aleyna; Yuksel, Huseyin Taner; Akbas, Baris] Kadir Has Univ, Dept Comp Engn, TR-34083 Istanbul, Turkiye; [Sarac, Mine] Kadir Has Univ, Dept Mechatron Engn, TR-34083 Istanbul, Turkiyeen_US
dc.description.abstractExoskeleton devices are designed for applications such as rehabilitation, assistance, and haptics. Due to the nature of physical human-machine interaction, designing and operating these devices is quite challenging. Optimization methods lessen the severity of these challenges and help designers develop the device they need. In this paper, we present an extensive and systematic literature search on the optimization methods used for the mechanical design of exoskeletons. We completed the search in the IEEE, ACM, and MDPI databases between 2017 and 2023 using the keywords exoskeleton, design, and optimization. We categorized our findings in terms of which limb (i.e., hand, wrist, arm, or leg) and application (assistive, rehabilitation, or haptic) the exoskeleton was designed for, the optimization metrics (force transmission, workspace, size, and adjustability/calibration), and the optimization method (categorized as evolutionary computation or non-evolutionary computation methods). We discuss our observations with respect to how the optimization methods have been implemented based on our findings. We conclude our paper with suggestions for future research.en_US
dc.identifier.citation1
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/robotics12040106en_US
dc.identifier.issn2218-6581
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85169095045en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/robotics12040106
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/5341
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001057439400001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.khas20231019-WoSen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMdpien_US
dc.relation.ispartofRoboticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectMultimodal OptimizationEn_Us
dc.subjectDifferential EvolutionEn_Us
dc.subjectNeuro-RehabilitationEn_Us
dc.subjectAlgorithmEn_Us
dc.subjectTransmissionEn_Us
dc.subjectActuatorEn_Us
dc.subjectTaskEn_Us
dc.subjectMultimodal Optimization
dc.subjectDifferential Evolution
dc.subjectexoskeletonen_US
dc.subjectNeuro-Rehabilitation
dc.subjectdesignen_US
dc.subjectAlgorithm
dc.subjectoptimizationen_US
dc.subjectTransmission
dc.subjectevolutionary algorithmsen_US
dc.subjectActuator
dc.subjectmechanical designen_US
dc.subjectTask
dc.subjectroboticsen_US
dc.titleOptimizing Exoskeleton Design with Evolutionary Computation: An Intensive Surveyen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf8babe23-f015-4905-a50a-4e9567f9ee8d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf8babe23-f015-4905-a50a-4e9567f9ee8d

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
5341.pdf
Size:
1.43 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Tam Metin / Full Text