Reflective Thinking Predicts Disbelief in God Across 19 Countries

dc.authorid Ross, Robert/0000-0001-8711-1675
dc.authorid Ghasemi, Omidreza/0000-0001-7511-5580
dc.authorscopusid 57220761172
dc.authorscopusid 56498563100
dc.authorscopusid 57200182087
dc.authorscopusid 57207454819
dc.authorscopusid 23567212800
dc.authorwosid Ross, Robert/Abr-5640-2022
dc.contributor.author Yılmaz, Onurcan
dc.contributor.author Yilmaz, Onurcan
dc.contributor.author Isler, Ozan
dc.contributor.author Terry, Jenny
dc.contributor.author Ross, Robert M.
dc.contributor.other Psychology
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-15T18:39:29Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-15T18:39:29Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.department Kadir Has University en_US
dc.department-temp [Ghasemi, Omid] Univ New South Wales, Inst Climate Risk & Response, Sydney, Australia; [Yilmaz, Onurcan] Kadir Has Univ, Dept Psychol, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Isler, Ozan] Univ Queensland, Sch Econ, Brisbane, Australia; [Terry, Jenny] Univ Sussex, Sch Psychol, Brighton, England; [Ross, Robert M.] Macquarie Univ, Dept Philosophy, Sydney, Australia en_US
dc.description Ross, Robert/0000-0001-8711-1675; Ghasemi, Omidreza/0000-0001-7511-5580 en_US
dc.description.abstract In the present study, we tested three hypotheses about relationships between reflective thinking, intuitive thinking (both measured using the Cognitive Reflection Test; CRT), and belief in God or gods (BiG) in university students across 19 culturally and geographically diverse countries (n = 7,771). In support of our first hypothesis, we found a negative relationship between reflective thinking and BiG; and in support of our second hypothesis, we found a positive relationship between intuitive thinking and BiG. Contrary to our third hypothesis, we found no evidence that measuring CRT prior to measuring BiG decreased BiG. Given that this is the first large cross-cultural test of these hypotheses to have a preregistered analysis plan, the first to hold education constant across countries, and the first to use both Bayesian and frequentist methods, these results considerably bolster the evidence in support of the first two hypotheses and against the third hypothesis. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship CAUL; John Templeton Foundation [62631]; Templeton Religion Trust [TRT0424] en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions. This work was supported by the John Templeton Foundation [Grant ID: 62631] and Templeton Religion Trust [Grant ID: TRT0424]. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Social Science Citation Index
dc.identifier.doi 10.3758/s13423-025-02691-9
dc.identifier.issn 1069-9384
dc.identifier.issn 1531-5320
dc.identifier.pmid 40274723
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105003386616
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q1
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02691-9
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/7323
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001478549400001
dc.identifier.wosquality Q1
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 0
dc.subject Belief In God en_US
dc.subject Cognitive Reflection Test en_US
dc.subject Intuition en_US
dc.subject Prime en_US
dc.subject Reflection en_US
dc.title Reflective Thinking Predicts Disbelief in God Across 19 Countries en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 0
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 9871d16b-164e-4f1d-b0e5-8eef999e6b38
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9871d16b-164e-4f1d-b0e5-8eef999e6b38
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 9390486a-b1dc-46cf-ad5f-31415f0c8b95
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9390486a-b1dc-46cf-ad5f-31415f0c8b95

Files