Attentional Modulation of Outlier Processing

dc.authorscopusid 54391048300
dc.authorscopusid 57754894700
dc.authorscopusid 55951955400
dc.authorwosid Yıldırım, Bugay/Adj-7108-2022
dc.authorwosid Boduroglu, Aysecan/Aam-5868-2020
dc.authorwosid Gokce, Ahu/B-3090-2015
dc.contributor.author Gokce, Ahu
dc.contributor.author Yildirim, Bugay
dc.contributor.author Boduroglu, Aysecan
dc.date.accessioned 2025-07-15T18:46:06Z
dc.date.available 2025-07-15T18:46:06Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.department Kadir Has University en_US
dc.department-temp [Gokce, Ahu] Kadir Has Univ, Dept Psychol, Cibali Mah Hisaralti Cad 17, TR-34083 Istanbul, Turkiye; [Yildirim, Bugay; Boduroglu, Aysecan] Koc Univ, Dept Psychol, Istanbul, Turkiye en_US
dc.description.abstract Ensemble perception enables the visual system to function effectively when the number of stimuli in the environment exceeds its capacity. Ensemble representations not only help the limited capacity of visual representations, but they also facilitate the detection and representation of items deviating from the group (i.e., the outlier). This study focuses on how attentional mechanisms modulate outlier processing. In three experiments, we presented participants with an ensemble that was formed by circle stimuli in varying sizes, and the outlier item was distinct in terms of its location. We measured outlier localization performance while manipulating attentional orienting via a spatial cueing paradigm. In Experiment 1, a valid, invalid, or neutral cue was presented before or after the display. Facilitation of outlier localization was most pronounced in the valid precue condition. Experiment 2 included a task to actively engage ensemble perception in addition to outlier localization, and cue validity effect was observed as in Experiment 1. Experiment 3A was carried to directly compare the top-down and bottom-up influences on outlier processing by presenting two spatial outliers-one target and another distractor outlier. The target outlier identity was previously determined and was identical across trials. In Experiment 3B, the target was in red, making it salient among the remaining items. In the invalid trials, where the distractor outlier was cued, responses were closer to the distractor item indicating that outlier processing is cue driven. These experiments overall demonstrate that automaticity of outlier processing can be overridden by cue-driven processes. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey [121K064] en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This work was supported with a grant from TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey, Project no: 121K064) granted to A.G en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded - Social Science Citation Index
dc.identifier.doi 10.3758/s13414-025-03109-3
dc.identifier.endpage 1543 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1943-3921
dc.identifier.issn 1943-393X
dc.identifier.issue 5 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 40514626
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105008543230
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q3
dc.identifier.startpage 1530 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-025-03109-3
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/7391
dc.identifier.volume 87 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001507750400001
dc.identifier.wosquality Q3
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Outlier Processing en_US
dc.subject Endogenous Spatial Cues en_US
dc.subject Top-Down And Bottom-Up Attentional Mechanisms en_US
dc.title Attentional Modulation of Outlier Processing en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication

Files