A Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Terms Set-Based AHP and TOPSIS Methodology for Fuel Coal Type Selection Problem of Industrial Facilities

dc.authorscopusid24823628300
dc.authorscopusid55943904700
dc.contributor.authorYucekaya,A.
dc.contributor.authorAyağ,Z.
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-15T19:42:41Z
dc.date.available2024-10-15T19:42:41Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentKadir Has Universityen_US
dc.department-tempYucekaya A., Department of Industrial Engineering, Piri Reis University, 34940 Tuzla, İstanbul, Turkey Department of Industrial Engineering, Kadir Has University, 34083 Cibali, İstanbul, Turkey; Ayağ Z., Department of Industrial Engineering, Piri Reis University, 34940 Tuzla, İstanbul, Turkey Department of Industrial Engineering, Kadir Has University, 34083 Cibali, İstanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractCoal is still used widely by both industrial facilities and coal fired power plants. Lignite, hard coal, coke, and imported coal are some alternatives. The coal has ash content, moisture content, heat rate, volatile matter, carbon content, sulphur content, and size that need to be considered as well as price. The suppliers provide coal products for each coal type, and the most appropriate coal product needs to be selected considering different parameters. Therefore, in this paper, a hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets-based AHP (HFLTS-AHP) and TOPSIS method are used to select the best coal type alternative for industrial facilities. As the HFLTS-AHP is used to weight the evaluation criteria, TOPSIS is utilized to rank the fuel coal type alternatives. The proposed methodology offers an innovative and novel approach to help industrial facilities select the appropriate coal product while balancing the outputs, such as carbon, sulphur, ash content, and so on. In another point of view, the motivation of this research is to help industrial firms find out the ultimate fuel coal alternative based on their needs. This objective is realized using the proposed approach that integrates the HFLTS-AHP and TOPSIS approaches for the related problem, also utilizing group decision making. Moreover, this approach is concreted by an Excel template that provides an effective tool for firms to realize the evaluation process without many tiresome fuzzy comparisons and complex calculations. Furthermore, in the paper, a real-life case study in Turkish industrial facilities is presented to demonstrate the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed approach to readers and practitioners. In this case, seven coal type options are evaluated in terms of eight criteria by three decision makers, and the best coal type alternative is determined. © 2024 Old City Publishing, Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi[SCOPUS-DOI-BELIRLENECEK-5]
dc.identifier.endpage496en_US
dc.identifier.issn1542-3980
dc.identifier.issue4-6en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85200628471
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage473en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/6569
dc.identifier.volume43en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOld City Publishingen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computingen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectFuel coal type selection problemen_US
dc.subjectgroup decision makingen_US
dc.subjectHFLTS-AHPen_US
dc.subjectMCDMen_US
dc.subjectTOPSISen_US
dc.titleA Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Terms Set-Based AHP and TOPSIS Methodology for Fuel Coal Type Selection Problem of Industrial Facilitiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files