Does off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery reduce mortality in high risk patients?

dc.contributor.author Akpınar, Belhhan
dc.contributor.author Güden, Mustafa
dc.contributor.author Sanisoğlu, İlhan
dc.contributor.author Sağbaş, Ertan
dc.contributor.author Caynak, Barış
dc.contributor.author Bayramoğlu, Zehra
dc.contributor.author Bayındır, Osman
dc.date.accessioned 2019-06-27T08:01:05Z
dc.date.available 2019-06-27T08:01:05Z
dc.date.issued 2001
dc.description.abstract Background: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare outcome in two groups of patients who were classified according to their risk groups and underwent coronary revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. Material and Methods: Between January 1996 and July 2000 480 cases that underwent coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) were included in a retrospective nonrandomized manner for study. Group I included 210 patients who were revascularized using off-pump techniques. Octopus 2 and 3 (Medtronic Inc. Minneapolis MN) were used for tissue stabilization. Group 2 included 270 cases who underwent CABG using CPB. Emergency cases combined operations reoperations and patients in cardiogenic shock were excluded. Demographic variables were comparable between two the groups. Using the Allegheny Clinic Risk Scoring Scale [Magovern 1996] patients in both groups were scored as low moderate and high risk. In Group 1 37% of patients consisted of high risk patients while Group 2 had 14% (p < 0.05) Student's t-test and chi-square test were used for statistical analysis and alfa < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Mortality was 1.4% in Group 1 and 1.5% in Group 2 (p = ns). Mean anastomosis per patient was 2.6 +/- 0.6 in Group 1 and 3.2 +/- 0.5 in Group 2 (p < 0.05). Patients in Group I needed less blood transfusions and less inotropic support postoperatively (p < 0.05). There were also fewer minor neurological events (p < 0.05) and pulmonary complications (Type 2) in Group 1. Atrial fibrillation rate infection and major neurological deficit (Type 1) were similar in both groups. Mortality was less among Group 1 high risk patients (3.9%) in comparison to Group 2 high risk patients (7.9%) but this did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: In low or moderate risk patients CABG can be performed safely with or without CPB. In high risk patients with several comorbidities off-pump CABG seems to be a safe and efficient method that can improve outcome. en_US]
dc.identifier.citationcount 8
dc.identifier.endpage 236
dc.identifier.issn 1098-3511 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1522-6662 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1098-3511
dc.identifier.issn 1522-6662
dc.identifier.issue 3
dc.identifier.pmid 11673143 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-0034799721 en_US
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q3
dc.identifier.startpage 231 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/247
dc.identifier.volume 4 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000171126400010 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.institutionauthor Sanisoğlu, İlhan en_US
dc.institutionauthor Sağbaş, Ertan en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Forum Multimedia Publishing LLC. en_US
dc.relation.journal The Heart Surgery Forum en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 11
dc.title Does off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery reduce mortality in high risk patients? en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 8
dspace.entity.type Publication

Files