Yılmaz, Onurcan
Loading...
Profile URL
Name Variants
Yilmaz,O.
Yilmaz,Onurcan
Yılmaz, O.
YILMAZ, Onurcan
Yılmaz, Onurcan
O. Yılmaz
Onurcan Yılmaz
Onurcan, Yilmaz
YILMAZ, ONURCAN
Yılmaz, ONURCAN
Yılmaz O.
Yilmaz, Onurcan
Onurcan YILMAZ
Y., Onurcan
ONURCAN YILMAZ
Y.,Onurcan
Yılmaz,O.
Yilmaz,Onurcan
Yılmaz, O.
YILMAZ, Onurcan
Yılmaz, Onurcan
O. Yılmaz
Onurcan Yılmaz
Onurcan, Yilmaz
YILMAZ, ONURCAN
Yılmaz, ONURCAN
Yılmaz O.
Yilmaz, Onurcan
Onurcan YILMAZ
Y., Onurcan
ONURCAN YILMAZ
Y.,Onurcan
Yılmaz,O.
Job Title
Doç. Dr.
Email Address
Main Affiliation
Psychology
Status
Current Staff
Website
ORCID ID
Scopus Author ID
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID
Sustainable Development Goals
11
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES
1
Research Products
17
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
1
Research Products
14
LIFE BELOW WATER
0
Research Products
8
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
1
Research Products
15
LIFE ON LAND
0
Research Products
1
NO POVERTY
0
Research Products
7
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY
0
Research Products
6
CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION
0
Research Products
12
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
2
Research Products
16
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS
1
Research Products
9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
0
Research Products
3
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING
4
Research Products
2
ZERO HUNGER
0
Research Products
4
QUALITY EDUCATION
0
Research Products
10
REDUCED INEQUALITIES
1
Research Products
13
CLIMATE ACTION
2
Research Products
5
GENDER EQUALITY
0
Research Products
Documents
70
Citations
1899
h-index
25
Documents
67
Citations
1752
Scholarly Output
61
Articles
41
Views / Downloads
510/17072
Supervised MSc Theses
14
Supervised PhD Theses
0
WoS Citation Count
551
Scopus Citation Count
524
WoS h-index
12
Scopus h-index
12
Patents
0
Projects
0
WoS Citations per Publication
9.03
Scopus Citations per Publication
8.59
Open Access Source
33
Supervised Theses
14
| Journal | Count |
|---|---|
| Personality and Individual Differences | 5 |
| Current Psychology | 5 |
| Judgment and Decision Making | 3 |
| Behavior Research Methods | 2 |
| Social Psychological and Personality Science | 2 |
Current Page: 1 / 6
Scopus Quartile Distribution
Competency Cloud
61 results
Scholarly Output Search Results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 61
Article Citation - Scopus: 10Validation of Morality as Cooperation Questionnaire in Turkey, and Its Relation to Prosociality, Ideology, and Resource Scarcity(Hogrefe Publishing GmbH, 2021) Yilmaz, Onurcan; Doǧruyol, Burak; Harma, MehmetArticle Citation - WoS: 20Citation - Scopus: 25How Is the Big Five Related To Moral and Political Convictions: the Moderating Role of the Weirdness of the Culture(Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, 2019) Alper, Sinan; Yılmaz, OnurcanThere has been extensive research on how the Big Five personality traits are related to political orientation and endorsement of moral foundations. However, recent findings suggest that these relationships may not be cross-culturally stable. We argue that how much a culture is WEIRD (Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic) could moderate how the Big Five is related to political and moral convictions. In a sample of 7263 participants from 30 countries, our results showed that the level of WEIRDness of the culture moderated (1) the associations of agreeableness and openness with ideology; (2) the associations of extraversion, emotional stability, agreeableness, and conscientiousness with individualizing foundations; and (3) the association of extraversion with binding moral foundations. The results were mixed and some of the interactions were small in magnitude. However, they clearly indicate that the Big Five traits' relationship with moral and political convictions are not cross-culturally stable.Master Thesis Sezgisel ve Mantıksal Düşünmenin Ahlaki Faydacılığın Boyutları Üzerindeki Etkisi(2024) Almaç, Halil; Yılmaz, OnurcanBu çalışmada, sezgisel ve analitik düşünmenin faydacılığın iki boyutu olan tarafsız fayda ve araçsal zarar üzerindeki etkileri incelenmiştir. Ancak, daha sonra yapılan çalışmalar (Isler & Yilmaz, 2023) akıl yürütmeye yönlendirme manipülasyonu olarak kullanılan tekniğin analitik düşünme performansını artırmadığını göstermiştir; bu da Capraro ve arkadaşlarının (2019) bulgularının yalnızca analitik düşünmenin etkilerine atfedilemeyeceğini düşündürmektedir. Ayrıca, çalışmalarında gerçek bir kontrol grubunun bulunmaması gözlemlenen etkilerin yorumlanmasını zorlaştırmaktadır. Capraro ve arkadaşlarının (2019) orijinal deney düzeneğini temel alarak, sadece onların kullandığı duygusal ve analitik düşünmeye yönlendirme manipülasyonlarını değil, aynı zamanda mevcut literatürde etkili olduğu bilinen bilişsel yanlılık eğitimini ve pasif bir kontrol grubunu da dahil ettik. Orijinal çalışmaya benzer şekilde çevrimiçi bir ABD örneklemi (N = 746) ile bir deney gerçekleştirdik. Sonuçlarımız, hem duygusal hem de analitik düşünmeye yönlendirmenin tarafsız fayda puanlarını bilişsel yanlılık eğitimi ve kontrol koşullarına kıyasla artırdığını, sadece analitik düşünmeye yönlendirmenin araçsal zarar puanlarını bu koşullara göre artırdığını ortaya koymuştur. Bununla birlikte, bilişsel yanlılık eğitimi kontrole kıyasla anlamlı bir etki göstermemiş, duygusal ve mantıksal düşünmeye yönlendirmenin bilişsel yanlılık eğitimi ve kontrole göre etkileri aynı yönde olmuştur. Analiz, Capraro ve arkadaşlarının (2019) orijinal çalışmasında olduğu gibi, yalnızca duygusal düşünme ve analitik düşünmeye yönlendirme koşullarıyla yapıldığında, ilk bulgular tekrarlanmış ve duygusal düşünmeye yönlendirmeye bağlı olarak araçsal zararda bir azalma olduğu görülmüştür. Bununla birlikte, iyi yapılandırılmış bir analitik düşünme manipülasyonu olan bilişsel yanlılık eğitiminin benzer bir etkisinin olmaması ve duygusal düşünme ve analitik düşünmeye yönlendirme manipülasyonlarının etkilerinin beklentilerin aksine aynı yönde olması, bu etkilerin yanıt yanlılıkları veya empati gibi diğer mekanizmalardan kaynaklanabileceğini düşündürmektedir. Gelecekteki çalışmalar bu etkilerin arkasındaki mekanizmaları daha kapsamlı deneylerle araştırmalıdır.Book Part Citation - Scopus: 19Actively open- minded thinking and the political effects of its absence(Oxford University Press, 2023) Baron, J.; Isler, O.; Yilmaz, O.[No abstract available]Master Thesis Meta-etiksel Görüşler Gerçek Ahlaki Davranışı Yordar Mı?(2023) Albayrak, Melike; Yılmaz, OnurcanLiteratürdeki mevcut çalışmalar meta-etik inançların dini inanç ve ahlaki karar alma dahil pek çok çeşitli tutum ve davranışı etkilediğini gösterse de bu çalışmaların çoğu küçük örneklem büyüklüğünden mustariptir veya kesitsel bir tasarıma sahiptir. Bildiğimiz kadarıyla hiçbir araştırma bu tür inançların insanların gerçek davranışları üzerinde uzun süreler boyunca önemli ve istikrarlı bir etkisi olup olmadığını incelememiştir. Bu çalışmada, nesnel ve öznel ahlak gibi meta-etiksel görüşlerin, ön-seçimle araştırmaya dahil edilmiş inançlı (örneğin Hıristiyanlar) ve inançlı olmayanlar (ateistler ve agnostikler) arasında 7 aylık süre zarfında prososyallik ve cezalandırıcılık gibi çeşitli ahlaki davranışları yordayıp yordamadığını araştırdık. Katılımcılar Prolific'ten seçilmiş ve Prolific tarama bilgileri kullanılarak neredeyse eşit sayıda inançlı ve inançlı olmayanlar şeklinde ayrılmıştır. Bulgular, nesnel ahlakın prososyalliği anlamlı bir şekilde yordamamasına rağmen, bir tür işbirlikçi norm yaptırımı işlevi gören ceza davranışıyla anlamlıya yakın ilişkiler sergilediklerini ortaya koymuştur. Bu etki, inançlılara kıyasla inançlı olmayanlar arasında daha güçlü olma eğilimindedir. Bununla birlikte öznel ahlak, bağımsız bir şekilde prosoyalliği veya cezalandırma davranışını yordamazken, ahlakın ilahi bir otoriteye dayandığı inancı prososyallik ile ilişkili bulunmuştur. Ön testte ölçülen bireysel farklılık değişkenlerinin düzenleyici rolüne ilişkin ek testler de anlamlı bir ilişki göstermemiştir. Bu sonuçlar, meta-etiksel inançların, özellikle ceza ile ilgili ahlaki alanlardaki davranışların önemli bir itici gücü olarak hizmet edebileceği fikrini desteklerken, prososyal davranış üzerindeki etkileri nispeten daha az belirgin olabileceğini ortaya koymuştur. Gelecekteki araştırmalar, meta-etik inançların intikamcı cezalandırma gibi farklı ceza biçimleri üzerindeki etkilerini incelemelidir.Article Citation - WoS: 2Citation - Scopus: 4Inferring political and religious attitudes from composite faces perceived to be related to the dark triad personality traits(Elsevier Ltd, 2021) Alper, Sinan; Fatih, Bayrak; Yılmaz, Onurcan; Bayrak, FatihWe used composite face images perceived to have different levels of Dark Triad personality traits (narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism) and asked participants to predict these target individuals' religious and political identities. In Study 1 (N = 550), Turkish participants rated faces with higher levels of perceived Dark Triad traits as less likely to be religious, to believe in God, and more likely to be left-winger, and to vote for a left-leaning party in all categories except for male narcissism. In a pre-registered follow-up study (N = 1001), we recruited a nationally representative US sample and replicated the same results with minor differences regarding male and female narcissism, and voting preferences. Participants' own political and ideological identities and their stereotypical evaluation of the target groups were mostly ineffective in explaining their predictions. The results suggest that people can perceive faces with higher levels of Dark Triad traits as less religious and less conservative.Article Citation - WoS: 4Multidimensional intuitive-analytic thinking style and its relation to moral concerns, epistemically suspect beliefs, and ideology(Cambridge Univ Press, 2023) Bayrak, Fatih; Dogruyol, Burak; Alper, Sinan; Yilmaz, OnurcanLiterature highlights the distinction between intuitive and analytic thinking as a prominent cognitive style distinction, leading to the proposal of various theories within the framework of the dual process model. However, it remains unclear whether individuals differ in their thinking styles along a single dimension, from intuitive to analytic, or if other dimensions are at play. Moreover, the presence of numerous thinking style measures, employing different terminology but conceptually overlapping, leads to confusion. To address these complexities, Newton et al. suggested the idea that individuals vary across multiple dimensions of intuitive-analytic thinking styles and distinguished thinking styles between 4 distinct types: Actively open-minded thinking, close-minded thinking, preference for effortful thinking, and preference for intuitive thinking. They proposed a new measure for this 4-factor disposition, The 4-Component Thinking Styles Questionnaire (4-CTSQ), to comprehensively capture the psychological outcomes related to thinking styles; however, no independent test exists. In the current pre-registered studies, we test the validity of 4-CTSQ for the first time beyond the original study and examine the association of the proposed measure with various factors, including morality, conspiracy beliefs, paranormal and religious beliefs, vaccine hesitancy, and ideology in an underrepresented culture, Turkiye. We found that the correlated 4-factor model of 4-CTSQ is an appropriate measure to capture individual differences based on cognitive style. The results endorse the notion that cognitive style differences are characterized by distinct structures rather than being confined to two ends of a single continuum.Article Citation - Scopus: 4Multidimensional Intuitive–analytic Thinking Style and Its Relation To Moral Concerns, Epistemically Suspect Beliefs, and Ideology(Society for Judgment and Decision making, 2023) Bayrak,F.; Dogruyol,B.; Alper,S.; Yilmaz,O.Literature highlights the distinction between intuitive and analytic thinking as a prominent cognitive style distinction, leading to the proposal of various theories within the framework of the dual process model. However, it remains unclear whether individuals differ in their thinking styles along a single dimension, from intuitive to analytic, or if other dimensions are at play. Moreover, the presence of numerous thinking style measures, employing different terminology but conceptually overlapping, leads to confusion. To address these complexities, Newton et al. suggested the idea that individuals vary across multiple dimensions of intuitive–analytic thinking styles and distinguished thinking styles between 4 distinct types: Actively open-minded thinking, close-minded thinking, preference for effortful thinking, and preference for intuitive thinking. They proposed a new measure for this 4-factor disposition, The 4-Component Thinking Styles Questionnaire (4-CTSQ), to comprehensively capture the psychological outcomes related to thinking styles; however, no independent test exists. In the current pre-registered studies, we test the validity of 4-CTSQ for the first time beyond the original study and examine the association of the proposed measure with various factors, including morality, conspiracy beliefs, paranormal and religious beliefs, vaccine hesitancy, and ideology in an underrepresented culture, Türkiye. We found that the correlated 4-factor model of 4-CTSQ is an appropriate measure to capture individual differences based on cognitive style. The results endorse the notion that cognitive style differences are characterized by distinct structures rather than being confined to two ends of a single continuum. © The Author(s), 2023.Master Thesis The Effect of Type of Threat on Political Ideology(Kadir Has Üniversitesi, 2022) Aktar, Bengi; Yılmaz, OnurcanThere is currently no consensus about the relationship between threat and political ideology in the literature. While conservatism as motivated social cognition account (MSC) suggests that when people are under threat, they become more politically conservative, the Terror Management Theory (TMT) argues that threat leads people to support their existing worldviews. On the other hand, the Issue Ownership Model suggests that some parties or leaders might seem more compatible in solving certain problems. Therefore, different types of threats might result in various types of shifts in political ideology. To clarify the controversy, in this research, we examined the relationship between the type of threat and political ideology in a Turkish context. We investigated whether the type of threat might produce different effects on political ideology. Participants read one of the three articles, and then responded to the political ideology measures. Two articles (terror threat – climate threat) served as manipulations (intended to elicit a conservative shift or liberal shift) while the other one served as a control condition. Our main hypotheses were that (1) participants in the terror threat condition would score higher on the conservatism scale compared to other conditions, (2) participants in the climate threat condition would score lower on the conservatism scale compared to other conditions, and (3) participants in the threat conditions will display more negative mood assessment compared to control conditions. We found no support for our main hypotheses; on the other hand, our exploratory analyses yield significant results for future studies to take into account.Article Citation - Scopus: 3Reflection Predicts and Leads To Decreased Conspiracy Belief(Elsevier B.V., 2025) Bayrak, F.; Sümer, V.; Dogruyol, B.; Saribay, S.A.; Alper, S.; Isler, O.; Yilmaz, O.Recent research indicates a generally negative relationship between reflection and conspiracy beliefs. However, most of the existing research relies on correlational data on WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) populations. The few existing experimental studies are limited by weak manipulation techniques that fail to reliably activate cognitive reflection. Hence, questions remain regarding (1) the consistency of the negative relationship between conspiracy beliefs and cognitive reflection, (2) the extent of cross-cultural variation and potential moderating factors, and (3) the presence of a causal link between cognitive reflection and conspiracy beliefs. In two preregistered studies, we investigated the association between cognitive reflection and conspiracy beliefs. First, we studied the correlation between two variables across 48 cultures and investigated whether factors such as WEIRDness and narcissism (personal and collective) moderate this relationship. In the second study, we tested the causal effect of reflection using a reliable and effective manipulation technique—debiasing training—on both generic and specific conspiracy beliefs. The first study confirmed the negative association between reflection and belief in conspiracy theories across cultures, with the association being notably stronger in non-WEIRD societies. Both personal and collective narcissism played significant moderating roles. The second study demonstrated that debiasing training significantly decreases both generic and COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs in a non-WEIRD context, with more pronounced effects for general conspiracy beliefs. Our research supports that reflection is a consistent cross-cultural predictor of conspiracy beliefs and that activating reflection can reduce such beliefs through rigorous experimental interventions. © 2025 Elsevier B.V.
