Can Reflection Mitigate Covid-19 Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs and Hesitancy

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2025

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Routledge

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

Objective design: Periods of social turmoil, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, tend to amplify conspiracy beliefs, evidenced by increased vaccine hesitancy. Despite this trend, effective interventions targeting vaccine-related conspiracy beliefs remain scarce, partly due to underexplored cognitive processes. Three competing theoretical accounts offer differing predictions about the role of reflective thinking in supporting conspiracy beliefs: the Motivated Reasoning Account suggests reflection strengthens commitment to pre-existing attitudes; the Reflective Reasoning Account posits that reflection enhances belief accuracy; and the Reflective Doubt Account proposes reflection fosters general scepticism. Main outcome measures: Utilising open science practices and a validated technique to activate reflection, we conducted an experimental investigation with a diverse sample (N = 1483) segmented by vaccine attitudes. We investigated the impact of reflection on specific and generic COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and vaccine-support behaviours across pro-vaccine, neutral, and vaccine-hesitant groups, while examining the moderating effects of scientific literacy, intellectual humility, and actively open-minded thinking. Results: The confirmatory analysis provided no direct support for the theoretical predictions. However, findings indicated that intellectual humility significantly moderated the effect of reflection, enhancing vaccine-support behaviour among participants with high intellectual humility, highlighting the complex interplay of cognitive style and prior attitudes in shaping responses to conspiracy beliefs and vaccine-support actions. Conclusion: The study highlights that while reflective thinking alone did not directly influence vaccine support behavior, its positive effect emerged among individuals with higher intellectual humility, emphasizing the importance of individual differences in shaping belief-related outcomes. © 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Description

Keywords

Conspiracy Theories, Covid-19 Vaccine Conspiracy Theories, Motivated Reasoning, Reflection, Vaccine Hesitancy

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

Q2

Scopus Q

Q1
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A

Source

Psychology and Health

Volume

Issue

Start Page

1

End Page

32
PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 1

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 2

SCOPUS™ Citations

1

checked on Feb 05, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

1

checked on Feb 05, 2026

Page Views

2

checked on Feb 05, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
10.50550383

Sustainable Development Goals

3

GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING Logo

7

AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY Logo

9

INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Logo

11

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES Logo

15

LIFE ON LAND
LIFE ON LAND Logo

17

PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS Logo