Can Reflection Mitigate Covid-19 Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs and Hesitancy

dc.contributor.author Bayrak, F.
dc.contributor.author Kayatepe, E.
dc.contributor.author Özman, N.
dc.contributor.author Yilmaz, O.
dc.contributor.author Isler, O.
dc.contributor.author Saribay, S.A.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-15T18:39:26Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-15T18:39:26Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.description.abstract Objective design: Periods of social turmoil, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, tend to amplify conspiracy beliefs, evidenced by increased vaccine hesitancy. Despite this trend, effective interventions targeting vaccine-related conspiracy beliefs remain scarce, partly due to underexplored cognitive processes. Three competing theoretical accounts offer differing predictions about the role of reflective thinking in supporting conspiracy beliefs: the Motivated Reasoning Account suggests reflection strengthens commitment to pre-existing attitudes; the Reflective Reasoning Account posits that reflection enhances belief accuracy; and the Reflective Doubt Account proposes reflection fosters general scepticism. Main outcome measures: Utilising open science practices and a validated technique to activate reflection, we conducted an experimental investigation with a diverse sample (N = 1483) segmented by vaccine attitudes. We investigated the impact of reflection on specific and generic COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and vaccine-support behaviours across pro-vaccine, neutral, and vaccine-hesitant groups, while examining the moderating effects of scientific literacy, intellectual humility, and actively open-minded thinking. Results: The confirmatory analysis provided no direct support for the theoretical predictions. However, findings indicated that intellectual humility significantly moderated the effect of reflection, enhancing vaccine-support behaviour among participants with high intellectual humility, highlighting the complex interplay of cognitive style and prior attitudes in shaping responses to conspiracy beliefs and vaccine-support actions. Conclusion: The study highlights that while reflective thinking alone did not directly influence vaccine support behavior, its positive effect emerged among individuals with higher intellectual humility, emphasizing the importance of individual differences in shaping belief-related outcomes. © 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/08870446.2025.2491598
dc.identifier.issn 0887-0446
dc.identifier.issn 1476-8321
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105008444823
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2025.2491598
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Routledge en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Psychology and Health en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Conspiracy Theories en_US
dc.subject Covid-19 Vaccine Conspiracy Theories en_US
dc.subject Motivated Reasoning en_US
dc.subject Reflection en_US
dc.subject Vaccine Hesitancy en_US
dc.title Can Reflection Mitigate Covid-19 Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs and Hesitancy en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.scopusid 57211604087
gdc.author.scopusid 59203099800
gdc.author.scopusid 59203099900
gdc.author.scopusid 56498563100
gdc.author.scopusid 57200182087
gdc.author.scopusid 22036552700
gdc.author.wosid Yilmaz, Onurcan/Mfi-7181-2025
gdc.author.wosid Bayrak, Fatih/Adn-7521-2022
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department Kadir Has University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Bayrak F.] Department of Psychology, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey; [Kayatepe E.] Department of Psychology, Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey; [Özman N.] Department of Psychology, Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey; [Yilmaz O.] Department of Psychology, Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey; [Isler O.] School of Economics, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia; [Saribay S.A.] Department of Psychology, Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 32
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q1
gdc.description.startpage 1
gdc.description.woscitationindex Social Science Citation Index
gdc.description.wosquality Q2
gdc.identifier.openalex W4409652178
gdc.identifier.pmid 40254737
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001471472000001
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type PubMed
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 2.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.5821716E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 4.255893E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration International
gdc.openalex.fwci 10.50550383
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.93
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.mendeley 2
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 1
gdc.scopus.citedcount 1
gdc.virtual.author Yılmaz, Onurcan
gdc.virtual.author Sarıbay, Selahattin Adil
gdc.wos.citedcount 1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 9871d16b-164e-4f1d-b0e5-8eef999e6b38
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 4f1d164d-1b19-48bd-8883-aff9d3f21c19
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9871d16b-164e-4f1d-b0e5-8eef999e6b38
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 9390486a-b1dc-46cf-ad5f-31415f0c8b95
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication acb86067-a99a-4664-b6e9-16ad10183800
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication b20623fc-1264-4244-9847-a4729ca7508c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9390486a-b1dc-46cf-ad5f-31415f0c8b95

Files