Transition and Equilibration of Neutral Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flow in One-Way Nested Large-Eddy Simulations Using the Weather Research and Forecasting Model

dc.contributor.author Mirocha, Jeffrey D.
dc.contributor.author Kirkil, Gökhan
dc.contributor.author Kirkil, Gökhan
dc.contributor.author Bou-Zeid, Elie
dc.contributor.author Chow, Fotini Katopodes
dc.contributor.author Kosovic, Branko
dc.contributor.other Civil Engineering
dc.date.accessioned 2019-06-28T11:11:01Z
dc.date.available 2019-06-28T11:11:01Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.department Fakülteler, Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi, Enerji Sistemleri Mühendisliği Bölümü en_US
dc.description.abstract The Weather Research and Forecasting Model permits finescale large-eddy simulations (LES) to be nested within coarser simulations an approach that can generatemore accurate turbulence statistics and improve other aspects of simulated flows.However errors are introduced into the finer domain fromthe nestingmethodology. Comparing nested domain flat-terrain simulations of the neutral atmospheric boundary layer with singledomain simulations using the same mesh but instead using periodic lateral boundary conditions reveals the errors contributed to the nested solution from the parent domain and nest interfaces. Comparison of velocity spectra shows good agreement among higher frequencies but greater power predicted on the nested domain at lower frequencies. Profiles of meanwind speed show significant near-surface deficits near the inflowboundaries but equilibrate to improved values with distance. Profiles of the vertical flux of x momentum show significant underprediction by the nested domain close to the surface and near the inlet boundaries. While these underpredictions of the stresses which cause the near-surface velocity deficits attenuate with distance within the nested domains significant errors remain throughout. Profiles of the resolved turbulence kinetic energy show considerable deviations from their single-domain values throughout the nested domains. The authors examine the accuracy of these parameters and their sensitivities to the turbulence subfilter stress model mesh resolution and grid aspect ratio and provide guidance to practitioners of nested LES. © 2013 American Meteorological Society. en_US]
dc.identifier.citationcount 56
dc.identifier.doi 10.1175/MWR-D-11-00263.1 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 940
dc.identifier.issn 0027-0644 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0027-0644
dc.identifier.issue 3
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-84875684523 en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 918 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/1419
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00263.1
dc.identifier.volume 141 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality Q2
dc.institutionauthor Kirkil, Gökhan en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.journal Monthly Weather Review en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 59
dc.subject Large eddy simulations en_US
dc.subject Model evaluation/performance en_US
dc.subject Parameterization en_US
dc.subject Subgrid-scale processes en_US
dc.title Transition and Equilibration of Neutral Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flow in One-Way Nested Large-Eddy Simulations Using the Weather Research and Forecasting Model en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication c777ed76-9b8f-43f2-a3b0-0222883181af
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery c777ed76-9b8f-43f2-a3b0-0222883181af
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 4b0883c1-acc5-4acd-aa2f-cdb841a0e58a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 4b0883c1-acc5-4acd-aa2f-cdb841a0e58a

Files