Effects of Color Cues on Eye-Hand Coordination Training With a Mirror Drawing Task in Virtual Environment
Loading...

Date
2024
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Frontiers Media Sa
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Mirror drawing is a motor learning task that is used to evaluate and improve eye-hand coordination of users and can be implemented in immersive Virtual Reality (VR) Head-Mounted Displays (HMDs) for training purposes. In this paper, we investigated the effect of color cues on user motor performance in a mirror-drawing task between Virtual Environment (VE) and Real World (RW), with three different colors. We conducted a 5-day user study with twelve participants. The results showed that the participants made fewer errors in RW compared to VR, except for pre-training, which indicated that hardware and software limitations have detrimental effects on the motor learning of the participants across different realities. Furthermore, participants made fewer errors with the colors close to green, which is usually associated with serenity, contentment, and relaxation. According to our findings, VR headsets can be used to evaluate participants' eye-hand coordination in mirror drawing tasks to evaluate the motor-learning of participants. VE and RW training applications could benefit from our findings in order to enhance their effectiveness.
Description
Batmaz, Anil Ufuk/0000-0001-7948-8093
ORCID
Keywords
virtual reality, mirror drawing test, eye-hand coordination, training, motor performance, color, color theory, training, motor performance, eye-hand coordination, virtual reality, Psychology, mirror drawing test, color, BF1-990
Fields of Science
03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, 05 social sciences, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
2
Source
Frontiers in Psychology
Volume
14
Issue
Start Page
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 1
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 31
Google Scholar™


