The Role of Co-Regulation of Stress in the Relationship Between Perceived Partner Responsiveness and Binge Eating: a Dyadic Analysis
Loading...
Date
2020
Authors
Tosyalı, Ahmet Furkan
Harma, Mehmet
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
International Union of Psychological Science
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
The main aim of this study is to investigate whether there are relationships between perceived partner responsiveness (PPR), co-regulation of negative affect between romantic partners and binge eating. Data were collected from 148 opposite-sex romantic partners (18-61 years old) with the mean relationship duration being 8.04 years. Dyadic data were analysed through the actor-partner interdependence model framework. We proposed a model where co-regulation between partners has indirect effects on the relationship between PPR and binge eating. Results showed that there was no direct association between PPR and binge eating scores of the participants. However, significant direct associations were found regarding both actor and partner effects of PPR on co-regulation between romantic partners. In addition, there were four significant indirect effects: Women's co-regulation had an indirect effect on the link between PPR and women's binge eating scores. Similarly, women's co-regulation had also a significant indirect effect on the link between PPR and men's binge eating. These findings are the first to illustrate a relationship between PPR and binge eating. This study is the first attempt to examine binge eating in terms of co-regulation processes.
Description
Keywords
Binge eating, Co-reappraisal, Co-regulation, Perceived partner responsiveness, Co-brooding, Co-regulation, Adult, Male, Adolescent, Binge eating, Perceived partner responsiveness, Middle Aged, Co-reappraisal, Young Adult, Humans, Co-brooding, Female, Interpersonal Relations, Binge-Eating Disorder, Stress, Psychological
Fields of Science
05 social sciences, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
13
Source
International Journal of Psychology
Volume
56
Issue
Start Page
435
End Page
443
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 6
Scopus : 11
PubMed : 1
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 20
SCOPUS™ Citations
13
checked on Feb 12, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
11
checked on Feb 12, 2026
Page Views
8
checked on Feb 12, 2026
Downloads
179
checked on Feb 12, 2026
Google Scholar™


