The Impact of Text Preprocessing on the Prediction of Review Ratings
Loading...
Date
2020
Authors
Işık, Muhittin
Dağ, Hasan
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Tubitak
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
With the increase of e-commerce platforms and online applications, businessmen are looking to have a rating and review system through which they can easily reveal the feelings of customers related to their products and services. It is undeniable from the statistics that online ratings and reviews attract new customers as well as increase sales by means of providing confidence, ratification, opinions, comparisons, merchant credibility, etc. Although considerable research has been devoted to the sentiment analysis for review classification, rather less attention has been paid to the text preprocessing which is a crucial step in opinion mining especially if convenient preprocessing strategies are found out to increase the classification accuracy. In this paper, we concentrate on the impact of simple text preprocessing decisions in order to predict fine-grained review rating stars whereas the majority of previous work focused on the binary distinction of positive vs. negative. Therefore, the aim of this research is to analyze preprocessing techniques and their influence, at the same time explain the interesting observations and results on the performance of a five-class-based review rating classifier.
Description
Keywords
Text preprocessing, Sentiment analysis, Opinion mining, Review rating, Text mining, Opinion mining, Sentiment analysis, Review rating, Text mining, Text preprocessing
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Q3
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
23
Source
TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTER SCIENCES
Volume
28
Issue
3
Start Page
1405
End Page
1421
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 6
Scopus : 36
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 213
SCOPUS™ Citations
37
checked on Feb 01, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
18
checked on Feb 01, 2026
Page Views
5
checked on Feb 01, 2026
Downloads
210
checked on Feb 01, 2026
Google Scholar™


